questions about the metasonix r-52!
- DonKartofflo
- The knob-twisting Hive Mind
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:56 am
- Location: Stuttgart, Germany / Bratislava, Slovakia
questions about the metasonix r-52!
Hey fellas, I just got a quick question:
I have been thinking about buying an r-52 since I like its sound from audio demos, especially its sorta soft and big growl.
However, it doesn't seem to get a lot of love around here, while people are expressing heir love for the other r modules, the r-52 seems to not really get a lot of mention... how come?
cheers
Don
I have been thinking about buying an r-52 since I like its sound from audio demos, especially its sorta soft and big growl.
However, it doesn't seem to get a lot of love around here, while people are expressing heir love for the other r modules, the r-52 seems to not really get a lot of mention... how come?
cheers
Don
FS:Nelson Baboon wrote:Beware of people who tell you to smile.
Mutable Instruments Tides 1 120€
Addac sys 12U powered frame 200€
- Cat-A-Tonic
- Lobsters love Muff
- Posts: 3750
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:03 am
- Location: Yokohama, Japan
The range of the Tuning Offset, and Resonance controls probably throws a lot of people off.
There is a narrow range (sweet zone) in which the R-52 functions as a normal VCF.
Outside that you get wild oscillations and weirdness.
The input knob usually has to be turned down about halfway (with modular level signals) if you want it to sound filtery.
You need to use a voltage offset if you want to sweep the filter through the typical range with a knob.
There is a narrow range (sweet zone) in which the R-52 functions as a normal VCF.
Outside that you get wild oscillations and weirdness.
The input knob usually has to be turned down about halfway (with modular level signals) if you want it to sound filtery.
You need to use a voltage offset if you want to sweep the filter through the typical range with a knob.
I don't think you get anything unexpected outside of the sweet spot, you just don't get any range to apply changes to cutoff frequency.
I think it's a very nice and interesting filter, one of my faves of the R series. It's not good for classic 24dB subtractive synthesis, but it's very characterful and suitable for alternative synthesis methods. It's very level sensitive and requires attentive listening to find the results that are pleasing for you.
One thing that is tricky, is that ideally it needs a hot signal going in to overdrive it (if you want that), +/-10v from typical solid state devices is fine, with tube oscs you might want to try adding more gain.
It also works really well with quieter signals going in, but there is some noise present from the switching power supply, that becomes more evident with lower volumes.
Also the output is quite low, so amplification afterwards can be necessary, but hey, these are tubes, you can just work with what is available.
I think it's a very nice and interesting filter, one of my faves of the R series. It's not good for classic 24dB subtractive synthesis, but it's very characterful and suitable for alternative synthesis methods. It's very level sensitive and requires attentive listening to find the results that are pleasing for you.
One thing that is tricky, is that ideally it needs a hot signal going in to overdrive it (if you want that), +/-10v from typical solid state devices is fine, with tube oscs you might want to try adding more gain.
It also works really well with quieter signals going in, but there is some noise present from the switching power supply, that becomes more evident with lower volumes.
Also the output is quite low, so amplification afterwards can be necessary, but hey, these are tubes, you can just work with what is available.
- ritchiedrums
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:58 pm
- Location: new jersey
- beedeesmith
- Common Wiggler
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:16 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas
- confusedinNC
- Common Wiggler
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:20 am
- Location: North Carolina
- DonKartofflo
- The knob-twisting Hive Mind
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:56 am
- Location: Stuttgart, Germany / Bratislava, Slovakia
actually not sure yet. It is between an r-52 and an r-51. I just want some yellow in my cab...metasonix wrote:So, does anyone want to actually buy R52s? I could make more, but want to see some serious interest first.
FS:Nelson Baboon wrote:Beware of people who tell you to smile.
Mutable Instruments Tides 1 120€
Addac sys 12U powered frame 200€
- radiodread87
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 2017
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:14 am
- Location: Great Southern Land
I love the R52, some things about it are quirky (its metasonix so that should be no real surprise)
the Resonance has to be quite high on it to get a louder signal from it (at least on mine..) and as mentioned it likes a nice hot input signal, TTA Z3000mk2 is great into it, if I am using an R54 most times its fine but if I want more gain I will put it into an R51 before with another R51 on the output.
It has sweet spots that make it well worth owning but as a filter its really unique and I wouldn't part ways with mine. Not many people have them I think, the R54 gets the most love and I do really enjoy that one as a filter too but the R52 is sufficiently different sounding to make both worth owning.
the Resonance has to be quite high on it to get a louder signal from it (at least on mine..) and as mentioned it likes a nice hot input signal, TTA Z3000mk2 is great into it, if I am using an R54 most times its fine but if I want more gain I will put it into an R51 before with another R51 on the output.
It has sweet spots that make it well worth owning but as a filter its really unique and I wouldn't part ways with mine. Not many people have them I think, the R54 gets the most love and I do really enjoy that one as a filter too but the R52 is sufficiently different sounding to make both worth owning.
"I have come here to Kick Ass and chew bubblegum.....and I'm all out of bubblegum"
"And since - my friend we have exposed your deepest fear! I sentence you to be exposed before all your peers! Tear Down the Wall!"
"And since - my friend we have exposed your deepest fear! I sentence you to be exposed before all your peers! Tear Down the Wall!"
- decaying.sine
- Broken <--> Fixed
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:05 pm
- Location: New Haven, CT USA
- bendedavis
- Veteran Wiggler
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 12:08 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
- SubliminalSandwich
- Ultra Wiggler
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 9:34 pm
- Location: Somewhere between machinery and poetry
- SubliminalSandwich
- Ultra Wiggler
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 9:34 pm
- Location: Somewhere between machinery and poetry
Loving the R-52, really flexible sound.. only wish there was cv control over the filter response..
Ive noticed in the 'high' setting, the resonance is much less pronounced.. is this the same with other users units?
Combining different input levels through R-51 and R-52 gives you sooo much control.
Gonna try putting my audio through other, (clean) VCAs before these two and cv control the input.. with a compressor at the end to even stuff out these two will sing (or scream!)

Ive noticed in the 'high' setting, the resonance is much less pronounced.. is this the same with other users units?
Combining different input levels through R-51 and R-52 gives you sooo much control.
Gonna try putting my audio through other, (clean) VCAs before these two and cv control the input.. with a compressor at the end to even stuff out these two will sing (or scream!)
So do I!SubliminalSandwich wrote:Loving the R-52, really flexible sound.. only wish there was cv control over the filter response..![]()
I was wondering: since the R-52 is two filters in parallel, and the RESPONSE knob mixes between them, how hard would it be to modify it to get the straight output from one of them? That way, you could put the separate outputs into a VC corssfader and essentially get cv control over filter response.
My DIY skills are limited, but my intuition is that this wouldn't be all that hard. There's even a spare hole in the panel for another jack!
-
- Thyratron Genius
- Posts: 2250
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 6:33 pm
- Location: San Francisco
I did this with a TM-6. I added extra opamp buffers to isolate the filters (though I had to change the internal crossfader because it no longer worked correctly with the added buffers). Now I have the same functionality for the mixed output and completely independent outputs for each filter. VC crossfading is as useful as you would think.wellurban wrote: I was wondering: since the R-52 is two filters in parallel, and the RESPONSE knob mixes between them, how hard would it be to modify it to get the straight output from one of them? That way, you could put the separate outputs into a VC corssfader and essentially get cv control over filter response.
My DIY skills are limited, but my intuition is that this wouldn't be all that hard. There's even a spare hole in the panel for another jack!
- ritchiedrums
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:58 pm
- Location: new jersey