but he's not saying that he doesn't have the $, he's saying that it is overpriced.

so, you support the effort and research that goes into making something like this, haven't used one, but will publicly dismiss it because of the price. makes sense.

i have heard the 18th, the 22nd, and the 26th, but no confirmation from anywhere yet....
(ordered from AH)

TBH, one thing I really dislike in the noise-GENRE is overcompression. The 0.1bit dynamics in most noise releases is really boring. Metzbow et. al. made the lack of dynamics work in the 90's to 00's, in a surprising way, but these days IMHO, having everything FULL BLAST is a cliche. It can suite so...

i found what looks like a nice little stand for all 3 (0-ctrl, 0-coast, and strega).
https://reverb.com/item/38531145-imposs ... 2020-birch

I find 99% of the music made with synthesizers/modular gear boring as fuck, but I don't go into a thread called "What do you find appealing about techno/ambient/EDM etc..." and talk about why I think it's boring garbage. I keep that opinion to myself, because in said hypothetical thread, that's wha...

Anyway, getting this discussion back to noise, are any of you familiar with Himukalt? I love how dynamic her work is. The subdued moments make the bursts of intensity stand out in a way that I love. The vocal processing is also particularly interesting and central to her aesthetic. Probably my favo...

i don't listen to enough music these days. i think i'll spend a little time now and listen a bit, starting with Himukalt above (had time to listen to a couple of minutes earlier, and very much liked)

I find 99% of the music made with synthesizers/modular gear boring as fuck, but I don't go into a thread called "What do you find appealing about techno/ambient/EDM etc..." and talk about why I think it's boring garbage. I keep that opinion to myself, because in said hypothetical thread, that's wha...

I love noise and texture and intensity, but only used alongside / in relation to more traditional music. It can definitely add to a track in terms of sound design but if the track is *nothing but* seemingly unstructured noise? Nah. Not for me. It needs to have some sort of relatively easily percept...

NARC NOISE wrote: ↑

Mon Feb 15, 2021 1:31 pm

Connecting recognition to success or validity seems pretty empty to me.

of course it is.

He is trolling. It's easy to use that as a criticism in the place of a real argument, but in this case I think that it is obviously true.

I think if it has real value it should be robust enough to deal with a couple of dismissive comments. Outside of the Fifties and Sixties avant-garde, how many “noise artists” have ever achieved recognition outside of a tiny audience of cassette music collectors? It all seems very old fashioned and ...

01235813 wrote: ↑

Mon Feb 15, 2021 12:25 pm

How so?

an abstraction of a portrait is still essentially a portrait. I don't think that music 'means' anything. It is not by its nature depicting something, and noise music is not an abstraction of melody/harmony/rhythm.

I mean, I guess I'm referring to the tension between the notion that "one must learn the rules in order to break them" and feeling an obligation to at least try to learn those rules despite not having any natural inclination, and the fact that this self evolution led me to realize that, in fact, th...

urgh - my apologies. the graphics for my online items are now HUGE. Not sure why an attempted edit on the links has made it so. If I can't fix it, i will delete the links. Help! (edit - i removed the links to my music because i couldn't figure out how not to display huge graphics for each. if anyone...

"Also, I finally got around to listening to stuff on Ancient Eyeball Recipe's Soundcloud page. I listened to 5-6 clips on there in their entirety and I wouldn't call any of it music. It's in the audio spectrum... and that's about it. If people like listening to that stuff, more power to them."
Skunk3

I love noise and texture and intensity, but only used alongside / in relation to more traditional music. It can definitely add to a track in terms of sound design but if the track is *nothing but* seemingly unstructured noise? Nah. Not for me. It needs to have some sort of relatively easily percept...

out of curiosity - anyone build these for us poor non-diy folks?

pmboos wrote: ↑

Mon Feb 08, 2021 6:39 pm

I thought Hainbach did a great job showing off all the sounds the thing could make.

he showed all of them?

i've now had a few hours to spend on this thing, and i have to confess that I really LIKE it. As far as new sequencers (damn, i just really like experimenting with them), i have picked up a 0-ctrl and this recently. The 0-ctrl can be fun and useful, but i don't like it as much as I do the noodlebox....

i believe that they said the expected that the arrival was in May.

GauthierM wrote: ↑

Mon Feb 08, 2021 3:59 am

.....

Some are boycotting Behringer because they make gear affordable for most of us.
...

that is not why people are boycotting Behringer.

another synth not mentioned here (that i have not received yet - could be awhile, coming from the UK) is this optotronics oi kant thing. i was very impressed with the demo on youtube.

oh - where is there more info on that? I'm a fan now..... X1L3 fb page. Shane posted posted about it on nov 20. 'Steel Sky' beta testing. There's also a X1L3 users group. yeah - very friendly fellow. he talked it up a bit to me in an email that i just got. hope it is released once i have some $ aga...

i think i'm good, unless the pdf on dropbox isn't the only text documentation.